Legal Opinion

Osterlind v. Hill

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

This is an action of tort brought by the plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Albert T. Osterlind to recover damages for the conscious suffering and death of his intestate. There are four counts in the original declaration and five counts in the amended declaration to each of which the defendant demurred. The first count of the original declaration alleges, that on or about July 4, 1925, the defendant was engaged in the business of letting for hire pleasure boats and canoes to be used on Lake Quannapowitt in the town of Wakefield; that it was the duty of the defendant to have a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Black v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Putnam v. SavageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Taft v. Bridgeton Worsted Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Lothrop Publishing Co. v. Lothrop, Lee & Shepard Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. Miami Development Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rakes v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  3. Pridgen v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. La Raia v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Farwell v. KeatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API