Legal Opinion
Citrus Group, Inc. v. Cadbury Beverages, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 26, 1991No. WN-91-2117PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is Plaintiff Citrus Group’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Paper No. 3) filed July 26, 1991. Defendants oppose the motion. (Paper No. 19) Upon a review of the pleadings, and after a hearing on September 10, 1991, this Court determines that Plaintiff’s motion should be denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Citrus Group (“Citrus”) distributes fruit juice concentrates and fruit juice drinks under the duly registered trademark “MAIN SQUEEZE.” (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Reg. No. 1,572,274, registered 12-19-89). Defendants Cadbury…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Pizzeria Uno Corporation v. James W. Temple, Jr., D/B/A Taco UnoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Rum Creek Coal Sales, Inc. v. CapertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Polo Fashions, Inc. v. Craftex, Inc., and Bobby O'Neal and Keith O'neal, Polo Fashions, Inc. v. Craftex, Inc. Bobby O'Neal and Keith O'NealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- M. B. H. Enterprises, Inc. v. Woky, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bell v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2008
- Cornwell v. SachsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000