Bell v. Harley Davidson Motor Co.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, and (3) GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO VACATE SCHEDULING ORDER
JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment by plaintiff Craig R. Bell (Doc. No. 92) and defendants Harley-Davidson Motor Company and HD Michigan, Inc. (together, “Harley-Davidson”) (Doc. No. 102), along with a joint motion to vacate the Court’s prior Scheduling Order and set new pretrial dates (Doc. No. 182). Both plaintiff and defendants seek summary judgment on all…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Gibson v. County of Washoe, NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dessert Beauty, Inc. v. FoxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Caiz v. RobertsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Corporation of Gonzaga University v. Pendleton Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2014
- Alfred McZeal v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Archi's Acres, Inc. v. Whole Foods Market California, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.