Legal Opinion

Doan v. Board of Supervisors

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1920No. Civil No. 1789PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of tbe County of Yuma. Fred L. Ingrabam, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

This was a case brought by the plaintiff, who was a resident and taxpayer of Yuma county, against the defendants, who constitute the board of supervisors of the county, to restrain said defendants from issuing the bonds of the county for the purpose of funding the outstanding or floating indebtedness of the county.

The case was submitted to the lower court for decision upon an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears, so far as the same is essential to a proper determination of the case in this court, that the defendants, as members of the board of supervisors of the county, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. TeedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hotchkiss v. MarionMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Veatch v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Board of Supervisors v. HawkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Ackerman v. BoydArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API