Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martin v. Reinstein

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 13, 1999No. 1 CA-SA 98-0260Published

1DissentKleinschmidt, Judge

¶ 112 I respectfully dissent. I think that fundamental fairness requires that persons who plead guilty to violent sex crimes must be advised that they might be detained for life under the Sexually Violent Persons Act. All of these petitioners pled guilty without knowing about the Act. All of them have served their sentences, so setting aside their pleas would be an inadequate remedy. The relief they are entitled to is exclusion from the provisions of the Act. See Brock v. Weston, 31 F.3d 887 (9th Cir.1994).

¶ 113 I would accept jurisdiction, grant relief and decline to address the remaining…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Louis W. Brock v. David B. Weston, Superintendent, Special Commitment CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API