Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Szaferman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The issue on this appeal is whether a non-binding county referendum question concerning automobile-insurance regulation, proposed for inclusion on the forthcoming general-election ballot by plaintiff, the Board of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer County (and by the Boards of Freeholders of every other county), is authorized by N.J.S.A. 19:37-1 to be included on the ballot for submission to the voters. We hold that the proposed referendum question is not one pertaining to the “government or internal affairs” of a county and therefore must be excluded from the ballot.
I
This action for declaratory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gormley v. LanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Botkin v. Mayor & Borough Council of WestwoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Botkin v. Mayor and Borough Council of WestwoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Santoro v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF BOROUGH SO. PLAINFIELDNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Camden County ClerkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co. Inc. v. Borough Point PleasantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Finkel v. Township Committee of the Township of HopewellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- New Jersey State AFL-CIO v. Bergen County Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Borough of Bogota v. DonovanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Adam M. Finkel, Catherine M. Kavanaugh and James J. Wulf v. Township Committee of the Township of Hopewell and Paula Sollami-Covello, in Her Capacity as Clerk of the County of MercerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.