Legal Opinion

People v. Drake

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s argument that his motion to suppress was improperly denied in the absence of a hearing on the issue of the confidential informant’s reliability. Contrary to defendant’s assertions, the reliability prong of the Aguilar-Spinelli test (see, Aguilar v Texas, 378 US 108; Spinelli v United States, 393 US 410) does not apply in cases of sworn oral testimony, where the issuing Magistrate can evaluate veracity to determine whether probable cause exists (see, People v Taylor, 73 NY2d 683, 688; People v Oxx, 155 AD2d 851, 852,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. OxxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. AshleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API