Legal Opinion

Nicastro v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 24, 1992No. CR-91-861PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the denial of three petitions filed by Michael Angelo Nicastro pursuant to Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P., requesting relief from two 1975 convictions and one 1982 conviction. The circuit court dismissed all three petitions without an evidentiary hearing, stating that they were not filed within the time established by Rule 32.2(c), A.R.Crim.P.

On October 6, 1975, the petitioner pleaded guilty to a charge of burglary and was sentenced to four years and six months' imprisonment. The petitioner, on December 1, 1975, pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BrannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Ex Parte LockettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  2. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  4. Tarver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  5. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API