Legal Opinion

Ceccanecchio v. Continental Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 15, 2002No. 01-4468UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

OBERDORFER, District Judge.

Danielle Ceccanecchio brought this action against Continental Casualty Corporation because it denied her claim for long-term disability benefits under her employer’s disability plan (“Plan”), which Continental both insured and administered. Continental denied her claim on the ground that the Plan’s preexisting condition exclusion applied. The district court disagreed and granted summary judgment for Ceccanecchio. On appeal, Continental argues that it did not act arbitrarily and capriciously because the record clearly establishes that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Maria H. Pinto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. George W. Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Kimber v. Thiokol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doroshow v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Johnson v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API