Legal Opinion
Doroshow v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 30, 2008No. Civil Action 08-259PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERT F. KELLY, Senior District Judge.
This is an action to recover benefits under an employee welfare benefit plan, which is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et. seq. Presently before this Court are Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Plaintiffs Motion is denied, and the Defendant’s Motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Jay Doroshow (“Doroshow”) was employed as a pharmacist at a CVS/pharmacy (“CVS”) in Bensalem, Pennsylvania from March 19, 2006 through March 29, 2007. During this period…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Maria H. Pinto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Oscar Hines v. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. General Electric Company, Monsanto Company, and Penn Central CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doroshow v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Doroshow v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009