Legal Opinion
State v. Murray
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 20, 1992No. 90-213PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
The defendant, Sondra Murray, was charged with disorderly conduct, RSA 644:2, 111(a), resisting arrest, RSA 642:2, and possession of marijuana, RSA 318-B:2, misdemeanors all reduced by the State to violations before trial, see RSA 625:9, VI (Supp. 1991). After a trial by the Court (Temple, J.), the defendant was acquitted of resisting arrest, but convicted of disorderly conduct and possession of marijuana, and now appeals both convictions. On the disorderly conduct charge, she claims that because no member of the public was present, her conduct did not violate the disorderly conduct statute.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lewis v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. McInteeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. SterndaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. BeauchesneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. RoachSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- State v. BoulaisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.