Legal Opinion
Sanango v. Generoso
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 6, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff, Sal T. Generoso, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated February 24, 2004, as denied his motion for summary judgment on his third-party complaint for indemnification.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellant’s motion for summary judgment was made well after the 120-day limit imposed by CPLR 3212 (a) and he failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay in making the motion. Therefore, the motion was properly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- Balbuena v. IDR Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Breiding v. GiladiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Milano v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Baldessari v. CainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009