Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. Disciplinary Board
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 21, 1997No. Civil No. 960391PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1] Bruce R. Montgomery has filed a petition for reinstatement to the bar. We conclude the hearing panel and Disciplinary Board failed to adequately consider Montgomery’s pre-disbarment conduct when they recommended reinstatement, and we remand to the Board for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] Montgomery was disbarred on February 10, 1988, for misconduct occurring while he was a partner in the Minot law firm Teevens, Johnson & Montgomery, P.C.1 See In re Montgomery, 418 N.W.2d 789 (N.D.1988). Montgomery consented to disbarment, stipulating he and William Teevens had improperly commingled funds…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Petition of PierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Application of ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re the Reinstatement of MurrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Matter of Disciplinary Action Against NassifNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- In re SimpsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Montgomery v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Matter of MontgomeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997