Legal Opinion

Chery v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 17, 2014Published

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.

The plaintiff, Marie Chery (“Chery), brought this action seeking in count 1, personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits under G.L.c. 90, §34M for medical expenses for injuries from an accident in which she was a passenger in an automobile insured by the defendant, Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”), and in count 2, damages for unfair and deceptive practices arising out of Metropolitan’s alleged failure to pay those PIP benefits timely. Chery by her counsel had sent a written demand for relief under G.L.c. 93A, §9 on September 12, 2007 and brought this action…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. York v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Wright MacHine Corp. v. Seaman-Andwall Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Klairmont v. Gainsboro Restaurant, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Fascione v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API