Legal Opinion

Hugo, Schmeltzer Company v. Paiz

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1911No. 2181PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. Hugo, Schmeltzer & Co. obtained writ of error upon the affirmance, on their appeal, of a judgment recovered against them by Paiz and others in the District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibrell

Locaría G. de Paiz, for herself as the mother of deceased, Louis Paiz, and as next friend for Frank and Otila Paiz, minor children of deceased by a first marriage, and Mollie Paiz for herself as surviving wife of deceased and as next friend of Louisa Paiz, a minor child of herself and deceased by the second marriage, brought this suit against Hugo, Schmeltzer & Co., a corporation, to recover damages for the death of said Louis Paiz, an employee of defendant.

The grounds upon which plaintiffs seem to recover damages may be stated summarily as follows: That Louis Paiz was an employee of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fleming v. the Texas Loan AgencyTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Young v. HahnTexas Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Syndex Corp. v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Gulf Refining Co. v. BoninCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Winnsboro Cotton Oil Co. v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Sullivan-Sanford Lumber Co. v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1912

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API