Legal Opinion

Smith v. Maytag Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1995No. A94A1979PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

Smith and Cook, sole shareholders and directors of TWS, Inc., and TWS, Inc. appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants Maytag Corporation, Amerivend Southeast Corporation, formerly known as The Richard Company, Inc. (The Richard Company), and Owens, a salesman for Amerivend.

The summary judgment to Amerivend and Owens was awarded on the basis of res judicata, based on prior litigation initiated by Park Leasing Company against TWS, Inc. and Smith. In that suit, TWS, Inc. and Smith counterclaimed against Park Leasing and recovered on their counterclaims…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Gilmer v. PorterfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Sorrells Construction Co. v. Chandler Armentrout & Roebuck, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. McNeal v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phinazee v. Interstate Nationalease, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Bradley v. Georgia Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Morrison v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  4. Morrison v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. O'BANNER v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API