Russell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
W.C. DAVIS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to twenty-five years’ incarceration in the Texas Department of Corrections. The Fort Worth Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction, holding that he had not invoked his right to counsel after being informed of that right through the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Russell v. State, 706 S.W.2d 824 (Tex.App.—Ft. Worth, 1986). Thus, the Court of Appeals held appellant’s twenty-eight page confession was…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ira Nash, Jr. v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Upton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.