Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentOtis, Justice
I agree with the majority that this case presents no serious question of jurisdiction. The only issue is one of choice-of-law. Although I share the view that the Minnesota rule permitting stacking is better law than the Wisconsin rule which denies it, I cannot accept the position that the application of Minnesota law does not deprive the defendant of a constitutional right to the protection of its “justified expectations.” Neither the original opinion nor the supplemental opinion which followed reargument, deals with the constitutional problems inherent in depriving the defendant of the right…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.