Legal Opinion

Vansant v. Ashland Water Works Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 23, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

W. R. Vansant was the owner of a dwelling house in Ashland. The Ashland Water Works Company was operating under a franchise by which it agreed to supply the city of Ashland -and its inhabitants with good, wholesome water, suitable for drinking and domestic purposes. *587The contract further provided that the water should be pumped from the Big Sandy river, and that the Ohio river water should not be used except in certain emergencies.

Vansant, who had failed and refused for more than three years to pay the water rent charged by the city, brought suit…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Elder v. Florsheim Shoe CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Levi v. GonzenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Bradshaw v. Steiden Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  5. Linville v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API