Legal Opinion
Page & Wirtz Construction Co. v. Solomon
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1990No. 17906PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
This suit began as a claim for $112,-176.18 due on a contract for restaurant remodeling work performed by Page & Wirtz Construction Company. The owner of the restaurant, Roy Solomon, counterclaimed under the Unfair Practices Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 57-12-1 to -22 (Repl.Pamp.1987 & Cum.Supp.1989) (commonly known as the Unfair Trade Practices Act), alleging that the proffered written contract was a forgery and asserting that the remodeling work instead had taken place under an oral contract. The case was tried to a jury who awarded $156,840.59 to Solomon. Page & Wirtz…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Ashlock v. Sunwest Bank of Roswell, N.A.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Florists Ass'n of Greater Cleveland, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
- Barnes v. Sadler Associates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Dale J. Bellamah Corporation v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Lohman v. Daimler-Chrysler Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gonzales v. New Mexico Department of HealthNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Mulford v. Altria Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.