Ashlock v. Sunwest Bank of Roswell, N.A.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Defendant Sunwest Bank of Roswell (Bank) appeals the trial court’s award to plaintiff George H. Ashlock of $20,081.98 in actual damages and $2,962.88 in costs and attorney fees. Ashlock alleged in part, and the trial court so held, that the Bank violated the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act. The Bank’s argument on appeal is that the trial court’s decision is supported neither by the facts nor the findings. We disagree and affirm the trial court.
In 1981, Ashlock received a mail solicitation from the Bank inviting him to open a new kind of high interest-bearing checking…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Perea v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Morse v. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of WhitmanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Goodmans Office Furnishings, Inc. v. Page & Wirtz Construction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Richardson Ford Sales, Inc. v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Glory Truong v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Hale v. Basin Motor Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Quynh Truong v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.