Legal Opinion

Zink v. Weingarden

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1988No. Docket 97047PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary disposition against plaintiffs on their claim for the equitable relief of rescission of a contract on the basis that there was another action pending between the same parties on the same claim. MCR 2.116(C)(6). We reverse.

The instant appeal has its genesis in an error committed by the circuit court in removing a case from the circuit court to the district court following a mediation evaluation. Originally, the parties entered into a contract for the sale of defendants’ hardware business to plaintiffs in 1982. Apparently, problems were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rutter v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Humiston, Keeling & Co. v. BridgmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Sovran Bank v. ParsonsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frohriep v. FlanaganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API