Legal Opinion
GPNE Corp. v. Apple Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 9, 2015No. Case No.:12-CV-02885-LHKPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING GPNE’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, OR FOR A NEW TRIAL; DENYING APPLE’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
On October 22, 2014, after seven days of trial and four and a half hours of deliberation, a jury concluded that Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Apple”) did not infringe two patents owned by Plaintiff GPNE Corp. (“Plaintiff’ or “GPNE”), and that GPNE’s patents were not invalid. See ECF No. 559 (Jury Verdict).
Before the Court are the parties’ post-trial motions. Specifically, GPNE seeks judgment as a matter of law…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- James Gillette v. Duane Delmore, and City of EugeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gpne Corp. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Loggerhead Tools, LLC v. Sears Holding Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Loggerhead Tools, LLC v. Sears Holdings CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Maria Victoria Baugh, Charles Lisée, and Miya Shani Hooks v. Detroit Club Management Company, Suzette Daye, and Lynn UralliDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.