Legal Opinion

W.G.W., in Re

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1991No. 01-90-00172-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*411OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

This pro se appeal involves the standard the court must apply when a non-parent asks to be appointed managing conservator of a minor child. Following the jury findings, the trial court appointed P.W., a non-parent, as managing conservator of W.G.W. The mother, L.A.J., who was represented at trial by an attorney, brings this appeal pro se, asserting four points of error. On our own motion we identify the parties by fictitious names. Tex.Fam.Code Ann. § 11.19(d) (Vernon 1986).1 We reverse and remand for a new trial.

L.A.J. (“the Mother”) and P.W. (“Patrick”) were married…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brokenberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Brook v. BrookTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Alan Gordon, Lauren Gordon, and IBL Construction & Design, LLC v. Dennis Leasman D/B/A Leasman Contracting, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  4. In the Interest of R.D.Y.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Cecil v. T.M.E. Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API