In the Interest of R.D.Y.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*317OPINION
SCHNEIDER, Chief Justice.
Appellant filed a motion for rehearing. We deny the motion, but withdraw our original opinion of February 1, 2001 and issue this one in its stead. Appellant, R.D.E. (“Mother”), and R.A.Y. (“Father”) together had a son, R.D. (“Child”). Mother was given sole custody of Child. Appel-lees, Father and D.E, the maternal grandmother, (“Grandmother”) filed a motion to modify the custody order. At the hearing on the motion, the trial court gave three-way joint custody to Mother, Father, and Grandmother. Mother was given limited visitation. Mother appeals the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gillespie v. GillespieTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Lewelling v. LewellingTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Wagner v. RiskeTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Johnston v. McKinney American, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In the Interest of A.M.S., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- In the Interest of S.N.Z.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- In re TinkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- In the Interest of A.P.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- In the Interest of S.R.O.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.