Rosenkranz v. Industrial Com.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
The referee recommended an award of compensation to Rosenkranz, the commission denied it, the district court affirmed the denial and Rosenkranz brings error.
The claimant is permanently and totally disabled and is suffering from a progressive disease, arthritis of the spine, which will sooner or later produce death. Since March 20, 1926, he has been in,the fuel company’s hospital, and will be cared for there permanently.
The commission’s finding was that the claimant’s disability was caused by disease and not by accident, which obviously supports the award; the claimant, however, says the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. W. A. Hover & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Industrial Commission v. ElkasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Republic National Life Insurance Company, a Texas Corporation v. Red Lion Homes, Inc., a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Elleman v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- C. S. Card Iron Works Co. v. RadovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Continental Investment Co. v. GarcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Industrial Commission v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.