Scranton Leasing Co. v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Mandamus by the Scranton Leasing Company against the Industrial Commission of Utah.
1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.
The complaint of the plaintiff, in substance, alleges that plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of Utah and engaged in the business of mining in 'Tooele county, and has in its employ about thirty employees in its said business; that the Interstate Casualty Company of Birmingham, Ala., is a corporation organized under the laws of Alabama doing business in the state of Utah as an insurer of employers against loss from liability imposed upon employers under *370the provisions of chapter 100, Sess. Laws Utah 1917, known as the Workmen’s Compensation Act; that on or about the 1st day of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Budd v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brass v. North Dakota Ex Rel. StoeserSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Industrial Commission v. Harbor Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Irish v. BrannenArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Fay v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Color Country Management v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.