Warren Bros. Co. v. New York State Thruway Auth.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. We affirm the order of the Appellate Division. The factual finding by that court of an absence of misrepresentations on the part of the State regarding the conditions at the job site, finds support in the record. The evidence also provides justification for rejecting claimant’s contention that it was entitled to rely on certain specifications used for other construction work performed by another contractor over 15 years prior to the contract which is the subject of this claim. Furthermore, it appears that an appropriate inspection of the job site by claimant, a requirement imposed…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Beneficial Commercial Corp. v. Murray Glick Datsun, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Idrees v. American University of the CaribbeanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Midwest Dredging Co. v. McAninch Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Minpeco, S.A. v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Robert E. McKee, Inc. v. City of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.