Legal Opinion

Robert E. McKee, Inc. v. City of Atlanta

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided May 11, 1976No. Civ. A. C74-2506APublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDENFIELD, Chief Judge.

This is a diversity action brought by plaintiff contractor against the City of Atlanta for compensation for additional work performed under a contract for the construction of the Utoy Creek Water Pollution Control Plant. The case is currently before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

The City awarded the construction contract in question to the plaintiff after plaintiff submitted the lowest bid for the work at $5,978,000. In order for the plaintiff to construct the facility in question it was necessary for it to undertake a certain amount of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. EH Morrill Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Midwest Dredging Co. v. McAninch Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. S & M Constructors, Inc. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Pinkerton and Laws Co., Inc. v. Roadway Exp., Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986
  5. Jasper Construction, Inc. v. Foothill Junior College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API