Legal Opinion
Beneficial Commercial Corp. v. Murray Glick Datsun, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 25, 1985No. 83 Civ. 3141 (JMC)PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CANNELLA, District Judge.
Defendant Nissan Motor Corporation’s [“Nissan”] motion to dismiss the amended complaint is granted in part and denied in part. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).
FACTS
Plaintiff commenced this action in New York Supreme Court seeking damages from defendants Nissan and Peter J. Ng for breach of fiduciary duties, damages from all other defendants for fraud, and damages from Murray Glick Datsun [“Glick”] for conversion. Plaintiff added a claim for negligence against Nissan in the amended complaint. Upon motion, the Court determined that the claims against Nissan…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Greenberg Traurig of New York, P.C. v. Moody, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Swersky v. Dreyer & TraubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- National Westminster Bank, U.S.A. v. RossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.