Legal Opinion

State v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 1978No. 7727SC655PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Detention, or “investigative custody,” without probable cause to make a warrantless arrest, is restricted by the Fourth Amendment prohibition of unreasonable search and seizure. Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721, 89 S.Ct. 1394, 22 L.Ed. 2d 676 (1969). Nevertheless, the criminal who seeks sanctuary within this constitutional right has been exposed by both the federal and state courts in decisions which have recognized , the need and the right of the police officer in the performance of his duties under proper circumstance to detain for investigation a person who is not subject to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. State v. StreeterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. MilienCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Matter of HorneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API