Legal Opinion

State v. Reynolds

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1997No. CC C93-1639CR, C94-0278CR CA A84607 (Control), A84608 SC S42601PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 163.427. He contends that the trial court erred when it denied his request to present surrebuttal evidence to rehabilitate his character for truthfulness after the state had called a rebuttal witness who testified that defendant was “very untruthful.” The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. State v. Reynolds, 136 Or App 212, 901 P2d 268 (1995). For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

Defendant, an elementary school teacher, was charged with seven counts of sexual abuse in the first degree for acts against four…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. CarrOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Faro v. Highway DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API