Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. De George

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 1984No. 382PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

Appellant was convicted in a non-jury trial of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, and criminal conspiracy. Post-trial motions were filed and denied. He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of two to four years to be followed by a consecutive five year period of probation. He here appeals from the judgment of sentence. 1 As we find merit in one of appellant’s claims of trial counsel’s ineffectiveness, we must reverse the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial. Procedurally we are also required to review claims pertaining to the pre-trial…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. DeGeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. KeeferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. McClearySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. LetaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API