Legal Opinion
Halleck v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 13, 2016No. 15cv8141PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:
Plaintiffs DeeDee Halleck and Jesus Pa-poleto Melendez—cable public access producers in Manhattan—assert claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution (the “First Amendment Claims”); Article 1, Section 8 of the New York State Constitution (the “State Free Speech Guarantee”); and Article 7 of the New York Public Officers Law (the “Open Meeting Law”) against Defendants the City of New York, Manhattan Community Access Corporation (operating as the Manhattan News Network or “MNN”), Daniel Coughlin,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Halleck v. Manhattan Cmty. Access Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Halleck v. Manhattan Cmty. Access Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Halleck v. Manhattan Community Access Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018