Legal Opinion

Simko v. County of Allegheny

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 2005PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

The personal representatives (Representatives) of the estates of three pedestrians, Rudolph Simko, Denise Golling and Margaret Williams (pedestrians) appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court). The trial court granted summary judgment to the County of Allegheny (County). It concluded Representatives’ claims were barred by immunity. We agree, and we therefore affirm.

This matter arises from a tragic accident that occurred along Corrigan Drive (Drive) in South Park, which is owned by the County. While driving, Edward Gill (Gill)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dean v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Walker v. ElebySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. KILEY BY KILEY v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Gardner v. Consolidated Rail Corp. SEPTASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Lockwood v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kohl v. New Sewickley Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Balletta v. SpadoniCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Dorsey v. RedmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Pettit v. NamieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Page v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API