Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Redman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 2014PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal by allowance, we consider, inter alia, the applicability of governmental and official immunity1 under the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act (“Tort Claims Act”)2 with respect to a claim alleging a violation of bonding requirements mandated under the Probate, Estates and Fiduciaries Code (“PEF Code”).3 Ultimately, we hold the General Assembly intended that 20 Pa.C.S.A. § 3172 of the PEF Code, which imposes liability on registers of wills and their sureties in granting letters of administration without security, created a targeted form of accountability for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. DuBree v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Brewington, S. v. Phila. Sch. Dist., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. William Penn School District v. Pennsylvania Department of EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Socko, D. v. Mid-Atantic Systems of CPA, Inc. ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Balentine v. Aplt. v. Chester Water AuthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. McGrath v. Bureau of Prof'l & Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API