Legal Opinion

Burns v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 11, 1967No. 52372PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Commissioner.

Appellant claims that the trial court abused its discretion in granting respondent a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence because respondent did not make a submissible case under the humanitarian doctrine. The sole assignment of negligence under that doctrine was failure to slacken speed so as to avoid the collision (MAI No. 17.15).

Respondent’s claim for damages for personal injuries, in the amount of $25,000, arose out of a collision between two automobiles on April 29, 1963, at the intersection of Spring Avenue…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vietmeier v. VossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Stith v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Spoeneman v. UhriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Schmittzehe v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. West v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bower v. Hog Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  2. Epple v. Western Auto Supply Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. Wiseman v. Missouri Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Hollis v. BlevinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Joggerst v. O'TooleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API