Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Tyng

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 3, 1939No. 17-19PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.. Both the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and the taxpayers Tyng and Buchsbaum appeal from orders of the Board of Tax Appeals redetermining the income of the taxpayers for 1929.

Two questions are involved in the appeals. The first is whether the transaction about to be described was a “reorganization” within Section' 112 (i) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1928, 26 U.S.C.A. § 112 note. If it was such a “reorganization” (and that it was one the Board found), then by virtue of Section 112 (b) (3) and (c) (1), 26 U.S.C.A. § 112(b) (3), and (c) (1), no gain should be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Cortland Specialty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. John A. Nelson Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Helvering v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. KitselmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. LeTulle v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Merrill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  3. Pridemark, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  4. Brown v. Cummins Distilleries CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944
  5. Fletcher v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API