Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Kitselman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 12, 1937No. 6022PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal raises the question of the de-ductibility of a loss claimed to have been allegedly sustained by a bondholding taxpayer in the alleged reorganization of a company with outstanding bonds. The taxpayer exchanged defaulted railroad mortgage bonds for a credit and stocks and bonds in a new company formed' to receive the assets of the debtor company, which were purchased at a sale on the foreclosure of the mortgage which secured the taxpayer’s bonds. In brief, liability depends upon whether there was effected such a statutory reorganization as is covered by section…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Cortland Specialty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  4. In Re 620 Church Street Building Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Helvering v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Alabama Asphaltic Limestone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. LeTulle v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Helvering v. New Haven & S. L. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. Banco de Ponce v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
  5. Commissioner v. Southwest Consol. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API