Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Watts

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 16, 1935No. Nos. 184, 185, 186PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

These causes involved deficiency assessments for income tax against the three respondents for the year 1924.

They were the sole stockholders of United States Ferro Alloys Corporation — herein Ferro Alloys — and the causes, alike in all essential particulars, were dealt with below in one opinion.

The respondents maintain that they exchanged all stock of Ferro Alloys for shares of Vanadium Corporation of America and bonds of Ferro Alloys guaranteed by Vanadium; that these two corporations were parties to a reorganization, and that under § 203 (b) (2), Revenue Act, 1924, no taxable gain resulted.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. LeTulle v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Groman v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SegallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  4. Starr v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  5. Lloyd-Smith v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API