Legal Opinion
Foster v. City of Fairbanks
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1996No. S-6933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Kayle Foster challenged the City of Fairbanks’ interpretation of an arbitration award. She appeals from the superior court’s order of summary judgment against her, claiming that the court should have remanded or vacated the arbitrator’s award because it was ambiguous or grossly erroneous. We affirm the superior court’s decision.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
On November 27, 1989, the City of Fairbanks (the City) notified Kayle Foster that it intended to lay her off on January 1, 1990. Foster had worked as a fire inspector for the City’s fire department since…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Teamsters Local No. 579 v. B & M Transit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Local 4-367 v. Rohm & Haas, Texas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Ahtna, Inc. v. Ebasco Constructors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Geolar, Inc. v. Gilbert/Commonwealth Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Hart v. McChristianSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Health Plan of Nevada, Inc. v. Rainbow Medical, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Porush v. Lemire Ex Rel. Estate of LemireDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Signal 88 v. LyconicNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.