Teamsters Local No. 579 v. B & M Transit, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Teamsters Local Union 579 (the Union) and B & M Transit (B & M or the Company) disputed whether certain B & M employees were required under the collective bargaining agreement to become members of the Union. This case is a product of that discord. An arbitration panel ruled in favor of the Union and the Union sought confirmation from the district court. The district court confirmed the arbitration award and sanctioned the Company under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for its conduct during the litigation. The Company appeals, arguing that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Morton M. Hill, Jr. v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Mars Steel Corp. v. Continental Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Local 802, Associated Musicians of Greater New York v. The Parker Meridien HotelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Muhammad v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Unite Here Local 1 v. Hyatt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Afl-Cio v. Gary Rabine, Individually and D/B/A Rabine Brothers, and G. Rabine & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Flender Corporation v. Techna-Quip Company and Robert J. McGuireCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.