Legal Opinion
United States v. OMAR, SA
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 14, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This is a motion for a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendants Lazard Freres & Co., Lehman Brothers, Belgian-American Banking Corp., Belgian-American Bank & Trust Co., First National City Bank of New York and First National City Trust Co. from selling, transferring, pledging, encumbering, disposing of or distributing any property or rights to property of defendant taxpayer Omar, S.A. A temporary restraining order was issued against the defendants on October 31, 1962, pursuant to Rule 65(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
It appears from the complaint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- First National City Bank of New York v. Internal Revenue Service of United States Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Clement J. Ings v. Murray Ferguson, Trustee of Equitable Plan Company, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Leon I Ross, and Ross & Company, Limited, and Central Trading, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- American Visuals Corporation v. Frederick A. Holland and Sam SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. First National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. First National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. First National City BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
- United States v. First National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. First National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964