Legal Opinion

United States v. First National City Bank

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 1, 1964No. 998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

377 U.S. 951

84 S.Ct. 1629

12 L.Ed.2d 496

UNITED STATES, petitioner,

v.

FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.

No. 998.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 1, 1964

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.

Henry Harfield, for respondent.

1

Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.

2

Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F.Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.

3

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. OMAR, SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Ray RoyaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  2. NAACP, Western Region v. BrennanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  3. United States v. Arthur Lee JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Henry StahlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. Riley WellsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API