Pippin v. Richards
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circnit court for Rusk ■county: John K. Pabisii, Circnit Judge. This action was brought to cancel a deed from plaintiff to -defendant Boyer for fraud and want of consideration, also to cancel a deed from defendant Boyer to defendant Alice M. Richards on the ground that said Alice M. Richards had notice of the fraud and equities existing between the plaintiff and Boyer.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circnit court for Rusk ■county: John K. Pabisii, Circnit Judge. This action was brought to cancel a deed from plaintiff to -defendant Boyer for fraud and want of consideration, also to cancel a deed from defendant Boyer to defendant Alice M. Richards on the ground that said Alice M. Richards had notice of the fraud and equities existing between the plaintiff and Boyer. The complaint sots up that the plaintiff on August 31, 1907, was the owner of 120 acres of land in Rusk county, Wisconsin, of the value of $1,800, which land was incumbered by a mortgage of $800;…
1Opinion of the CourtEeRWIiv, J.
The appellant attacks the sufficiency of the complaint on the ground that it appears therefrom that plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law. And further, appellant contends on the merits that the findings are not supported by the evidence, and that the court erred as matter of law in finding that plaintiff was entitled to judgment.
1. The objection to the complaint cannot avail the appellant, even if it he conceded .that the complaint failed to state a good cause of action in equity, for the reason that objection thereto on that ground was not seasonably made. An objection to the complaint on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brinkman v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Meyer v. GarthwaiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Frame v. FrameWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- Wickes v. LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Coe v. ManseauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bump v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- United States v. Linda K. Frykholm, Intervening Third-Party Claimant: Cotswold Trading Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Garage Equipment Manufacturing Co. v. DanielsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Miller v. GreenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Horicon State Bank v. Kant Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.