Legal Opinion

Thorsen v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1987No. 18960PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Gooseberry Estates, a partnership, against Harry Thorsen and Donald Gates (hereinafter Thorsen) for damages to a proposed real estate development in Sevier County caused when Thorsen dredged an inactive irrigation ditch which coursed through the development.

Thorsen was a downstream user of the irrigation water and contended that he had the right to enter upon Gooseberry’s property for the lawful purpose of cleaning the ditch. Gooseberry contended that the ditch had long been abandoned, that another ditch had been established in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Department of Highways v. SchulhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. Engineering Commission v. TedescoUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Brereton v. DixonUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Pehrson v. SaderupUtah Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quaker State Minit-Lube, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1994
  2. Henderson v. For-Shor Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. Strawberry Electric Service District v. Spanish Fork CityUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. United States v. Garfield CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2000
  5. UDOT v. LEJ InvestmentsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API