Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Stoyanoff

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1960No. 9888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, First National Bank, in the amount of $8,500.44, after a motion for a new trial had been denied. The action was brought in equity by plaintiffs and respondents, the First National Bank of White Sulphur Springs and J. W. Home, James J. Home, and Water Ray Home, demanding an accounting by the defendant and appellant, Sam Stoyanoff.

The plaintiff, J. W. Home, is the father of the other plaintiffs, James and Walter Home. Hereafter they shall be referred to collectively as simply the Homes. Stoyanoff, the defendant and appellant here,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Donovan v. McDevittMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Waite v. Shoemaker & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Harris v. RootMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Chealey v. PurdyMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Crenshaw v. CrenshawMontana Supreme Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McEwen v. Big Sky of Montana, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Scottsdale Insurance v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. First National Bank v. StoyanoffMontana Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API