Lomax v. New Broadcasting Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMcNally, J.
In this action for damages under sections 50 and 51 of the Civil Bights Law, defendant-appellant appeals from the order to the extent it grants plaintiff summary judgment as to the first and second causes of action and directs an assessment.
Defendant-appellant alleges, and we assume for the purpose of the motion, the facts establishing plaintiff’s consent to the use set forth in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Steuer. Nevertheless, section 50 expressly provides and the authorities affirm the need for written consent for the uses therein described. (Adrian v. Unterman, 281 App. Div. 81,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- General Phoenix Corp. v. CabotNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- 379 Madison Avenue Inc. v. Stuyvesant Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Adrian v. UntermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Adrian v. UntermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Lane v. F. W. Woolworth Co.New York Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brinkley v. CasablancasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Caesar v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Caesar v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Sperry Rand Corporation v. William R. Hill, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- Caesar v. Chemical BankNew York Supreme Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.