Legal Opinion

Caesar v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order entered May 13, 1983, Supreme Court, New York County (Norman C. Ryp, J.), which, inter alia, certified this as a class action and granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the first cause of action as to liability, is affirmed, with costs.

Under section 50 of the Civil Rights Law, the use of a living person’s picture for advertising purposes without first obtaining that person’s written consent constitutes a misdemeanor. Section 51 permits an individual to maintain an equitable action to restrain such use and allows a jury to award exemplary as well as actual damages.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shields v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Lomax v. New Broadcasting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  3. Shields v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Shah v. Wilco Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Globe Surgical Supply v. GEICO InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Argento v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API