Legal Opinion
Caesar v. Chemical Bank
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 22, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Norman C. Ryp, J.
Motions Nos. 10 and 149 are consolidated for disposition herein.
Is one unconsented series of (still) pictures of its employees by a major bank to advertise its electronic customer services (ECS) department at a trade show worth $300,000 in an unprecedented CPLR 901 and 902 class action under section 51 of the Civil Rights Law? What, if any, legal action, class or individual, lies against a chemical reaction by an impressive first class of its kind.
Plaintiff, Neville Caesar, upon behalf of himself and all other employees (who are not celebrities nor public…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arrington v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Brinkley v. CasablancasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Welch v. Mr. Christmas Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Lomax v. New Broadcasting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shah v. Wilco Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Globe Surgical Supply v. GEICO InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Argento v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Galdamez v. Biordi Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Cappetta v. LippmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.